TriNav’s PEDD approach significantly increases the T:N ratio,* which may result in better patient outcomes.1,2,4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8511/f85119322d290077693e399b1bf2984983fb4c7a" alt=""
PEDD Improved Tumor Targeting in Liver Radioembolization with Resin Microspheres.2
PEDD significantly increased both T:N Ratio and Tumor Dose compared to a traditional microcatheter (TMC).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9c6d/c9c6d225f5891d64a294758861cc6c6e81aaa369" alt=""
24%
increase in T:N via PEDD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85261/852618df76674fe7cd6da480119c76d0f9f67a5d" alt=""
23%
increase in tumor dose via PEDD
Study Design
A retrospective analysis of 61 patients with liver cancer (190 lesions). All patients underwent an MAA planning procedure delivered via a traditional microcatheter. Resin Y90 was delivered via either an traditional microcatheter (control group) or via PEDD, followed by PET/CT imaging. Each patient’s post-Y90 PET/CT was co-registered to their post-MAA SPECT/CT to compare the T:N ratio and tumor dose.
PEDD Significantly Increased Tumor Penetration and Response in DEM-TACE to Treat HCC.1
PEDD delivered a significantly higher concentration of therapy in the tumor compared to a traditional microcatheter (TMC).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73e41/73e413f5093f295821a05b802c1e86849f4378c0" alt=""
33%
increase in on-target
therapy delivery
via PEDD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/074a4/074a4fa3176cd394d9a3bfe55ee18c5b849e22a4" alt=""
55%
increase in
pathological response
via PEDD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/833f1/833f1550359729b4d87cfd46c9e1d33629e233b6" alt=""
23%
increase in
objective response
via PEDD
Study Design
A retrospective, single-center study included 88 treatment-naive patients with solitary HCC tumors <6.5 cm who underwent treatment utilizing either PEDD (n=18) or a traditional microcatheter (n=70).
Board-certified radiologists conducted blinded review of follow-up imaging according to mRECIST. Following liver explant (n=23), a board-certified pathologist performed a blinded review of the liver specimens to assess tumor necrosis and therapeutic distribution.
PEDD Significantly Improved Tumor Targeting Compared to a Traditional Microcatheter.3
In a variety of tumor types, PEDD significantly increased tumor deposition and significantly decreased non-target embolization compared to a traditional microcatheter (TMC).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77576/77576182bf28b771ca00f5c9e3f85a09c04aa583" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8be9d/8be9d2d6ccbddba60506bec649bf510f3f0f3125" alt=""
58%
Mean decrease in non-target embolization via PEDD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ded43/ded433137b8c7a255a8ed5a148ea69d72868e7f2" alt=""
68%
Mean increase in tumor targeting via PEDD
Study Design
A prospective study included 9 patients who were referred for Y90 radioembolization treatment of their liver tumors. Prior to treatment delivered via PEDD, each patient received two same-day sequential lobar infusions of macroaggregated albumin (MAA) via traditional microcatheter and PEDD. Every infusion was performed from the same location, and post-MAA SPECT imaging was obtained. Differences in MAA distribution within the tumors and non-target sites were evaluated.
The TriNav Infusion System Significantly Increased Tumor Penetration of Glass Microspheres in Both Lobar and Selective Deliveries.5
In a porcine liver tumor model, TriNav with PEDD was shown to significantly improve glass microspheres (GM) uptake in liver tumors compared to a traditional microcatheter (TMC) in both lobar and selective infusions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/483b5/483b58fc9283bc6060ed3983a0265f8dd6cc85b8" alt=""
117%
increase in total tumor penetration via PEDD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa072/fa072cf577b01877c4bbc06e04aa984ca24f0563" alt=""
39%
increase in total tumor penetration via PEDD
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a88b8/a88b8cd6ef067bf72dbfa09e8ba513ee75c0d7a3" alt=""
Lobar infusions via TriNav had statistically equivalent tumor penetration to selective delivery via TMC
Study Design
Transgenic pigs (Oncopigs) had tumors induced which measured 1-3 cm. Fluorescently labeled GMs were delivered via hepatic arterial infusion using a TheraSphere™ Administration Set to simulate TARE-Y90 therapy delivery. The study compared delivery via a TriNav to a TMC in both lobar and selective delivery positions. Livers were collected immediately after dosing, and a specialized imaging tool was used to detect GM fluorescent signal in and around tumors. A blinded quantitative analysis of signal intensity was performed.
A Multi-Center Registry Study of the Safety, Feasibility, and Outcomes of PEDD in DEB-TACE for Patients with HCC.6
Across 10 enrolling centers and a range of HCC tumor sizes, PEDD demonstrated a 6-month objective response rate (ORR) of 82.2% and a complete response rate (CRR) of 64.3%, with no toxicities above grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ced9/0ced9efeaf93e6aac97eaddefc32d41c64ef8a40" alt=""
Study Design
A multi-center registry study in which 114 HCC lesions in 72 patients were treated with DEB-TACE delivered via the Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery method from 2014 to 2017. All available 1, 3 and 6-month follow-up imaging (CT and/or MRI) was analyzed and efficacy was assessed by treatment response via mRECIST criteria. Safety was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0.
* Tumor to normal
References
1. Titano JJ, Fischman AM, Cherian A, et al. End-hole versus microvalve infusion catheters in patients undergoing drug-eluting microspheres–TACE for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma tumors: a retrospective analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(4):560-568.
2. d’Abadie P, Walrand S, Goffette P, et al. Antireflux catheter improves tumor targeting in liver radioembolization with resin microspheres. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021;27(6):768-773.
3. Pasciak AS, McElmurray JH, Bourgeois AC, Heidel RE, Bradley YC. The impact of an antireflux catheter on target volume particulate distribution in liver-directed embolotherapy: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(5):660-669.
4. Cook K, Gupta D, Liu Y, et al. Real-world evidence of pressure-enabled drug delivery for trans-arterial chemoembolization and radioembolization among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024;40(4):591-598.
5. Jaroch DB, Liu Y, Kim AY, Katz SC, Cox BF, Hullinger TG, Intra-arterial Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery Significantly Increases Penetration of Glass Microspheres in a Porcine Liver Tumor Model, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (2024), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jvir.2024.06.030.
6. Kapoor, B. et al. 3:18 PM Abstract No. 133 Surefire Infusion System (SIS) hepatocellular carcinoma registry study interim results: a multicenter study of the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of the SIS expandable-tip microcatheter in DEB-TACE. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 29, S60 (2018).